M3GAN 2.0’s Deeper Meaning Is Going To Make A Lot Of People Uncomfortable
Warning: this article contains Massive spoilers For “M3gan 2.0”. Continue to read at your own risk.
Like the T-800 by Arnold Schwarzenegger in “Terminator 2: Judgment Day”, the M3gan holder of “M3gan 2.0” (friend Donald / Jenna Davis) is not the villain of the new sequel to Blumhouse and Universal. Marketing and a large part of the story would lead the public to believe that the villain is Amelia (Ivanna Sakhno), the new advanced military quality weapon created from the code that Kurt (Stephane Garneau-Monten) of the original “M3gan” illegally sold to defense entrepreneurs before M3gan kills him in an elevator. Indeed, the first film “M3gan” was undoubtedly a history on the dangers of allowing the AI not to be controlled and the inherent danger of allowing technology to replace human connection.
“When we did the original, it reflected an era when I was deeply concerned about how technology, especially things like iPads and smartphones, reshaped parenting,” said the writer / director Gerard Johnstone in a press release. “But when we started to think about it, the GPT cat had arrived and the conversation around AI had changed.” The question of whether or not the AI would be part of our daily life has already been answered – it is here, and now we must understand how to exist next and Make sure AI does not take up the world.
Last week, Openai obtained a $ 200 million contract With the Department of the United States of Defense, a reality that should really horrify us all. “Of course, the government or whoever created [Amelia] might think they can control it, but what happens if it becomes sensitive? “, Myda the producer James Wan.” What happens when she decides: “I don’t want to be confined by the code of humanity-I want to be something bigger?” It is the real fear of AI. “But ultimately, AI is something that WeHuman beings, created. And “M3gan 2.0” rightly postulates that the danger is not just IA; It is also human beings who create and control technology in the first place.
M3gan 2.0 is a reminder that trombone theory should horrify us all
At the heart of “M3gan 2.0” is something called Trombone Theory, alias the Paperclip Maximizer, an experience of thought – as made in 2003 by the Swedish philosopher Nick Bostrom – which serves as a nightmarish inverse Infinite monkey theorem. In essence, the idea is that there is an existential risk inherent in giving AI tasks, even apparently harmless tasks as “do as many paper clips as possible”. For what? Because if it was not also programmed to assess living beings, this type of directive in an advanced machine would eventually try to transform all the material into the universe, including living beings, paper or machines that make more trombones.
Of course, AI trying to transform the world into trombones is an undeniable “bad”. Always, AI will always be a reflection of people who program it and those it “learns”So the real bad guys of this scenario are humans who have failed to teach AI to see living creatures as precious. It would be easy to blame Kurt for having sold the M3gan code or the government to have manipulated the code to transform Amelia into an infiltration droid which performs missions that he would not dare to send a real human to execute. But placing the blame on the shoulders of a person or an institution would be a little too clean and well tidy for the complexities of the AI.
Remember that Gemma (Allison Williams) was motivated to invent M3gan in the original “M3gan” as a way to call on parents who do not really want their children by playing an iPad in a best tangible friend. Even then, however, at least Gemma programmed M3gan to worry deeply about his newly orphaned Cady (McGraw Violet) niece. The problem was M3gan only cared about Cady. Kurt and the government, on the other hand, not soake up with Amelia with the desire to worry about any Humans, which is in itself an overwhelming reflection of the way the government considers human life. Worry about others is a lesson that must be taught and modeledAnd humans behind Amelia were too busy thinking about how she could kill her targets to consider that the programming of her conscience in this way would motivate her to kill her all people.
M3gan 2.0 is not pro-ai, but it is pro-responsibility
One of the greatest revelations of “M3gan 2.0” (although the one that is quite obvious to the jump) is that Amelia has not really “become a thug”, it is controlled by the kind of boy from Gemma Christian (Aristotle Athari), an anti-Ai-Ai-Ai step and the leader of a collective collective terrorist warrilla that works to strengthen the unregurated AAI. Her reasoning behind Amelia’s control is that the change does not come Since Washington, it comes has Washington. Meaning, the congress makes legislative changes due to external pressures or being faced with the solving an existing problem rather than using significant preventive measures.
It is more correct to say that change often comes to congress due to external pressures rather than being something that Congress initiates alone. At this stage, the “M3gan 2.0” conflict knot is plunged into an incredibly ethical and politically complicated arena – an AI Killbot version of the cart problem. Unregulated AI is absolutely a problem, but until it becomes A tangible threat, the congress will probably continue to do nothing to prevent this inevitability. Is it a necessary evil that Amelia destroys a controlled environment? Or should we continue to ask Congress very well and hope that he really listens? “M3gan 2.0” does not provide final answers, but he certainly wants us to think about it. “M3gan is not going anywhere, so what does it mean to live with her?” Johnstone is inquired. “Is it entirely bad or her behavior came from the way she was raised-how did Gemma have formed it? And if she had been guided differently, could she have learned the difference between good and evil? These are the questions we explore now.”
By not denying the reality of the existing infiltration of AI in just about all aspects of our lives (I could not even use Google while writing this article without “help of AI” trying to do works), “M3gan 2.0” asks the difficult questions that many people ignore in the hopes that it will disappear.
“M3gan 2.0” is now playing in theaters.
Post Comment