Antonio Banderas’ Gripping Historical Action Flop Is Finally Finding An Audience On Tubi

Strictly based at the box office, it would not be correct to call Antonio Banderas one of the biggest cinema stars of the 1990s, but once I put my eyes on the striking Spaniard of Pedro Almódovar of “Women on the Verge of A Nervous Breakdown” and “Eatt Me Up, Tie Me Down”, I wanted to be in everything. In terms of presence on the dead and dead sexy screen, Only Denzel Washington could match it. He became an American consumer sensation when Madonna failed to seduce him in her documentary from the “Blonde ambition” “” Madonna: Truth Or Dare “tour. Banderas was prepared for the Superstard. And Hollywood quickly groped the ball.

Advertisement

Banderas delivered the smoking articles in the animated historical drama of Arne Glimcher “The Mambo Kings”, but Warner Bros. did not know how to sell a film on Cuban music to American moviegoers, so he stiffen commercially in 1992. Many actor for the little role of the boyfriend of Tom Hanks in “Philadelphia” by Jonathan Demme. His next opportunity during a breakthrough in Hollywood arrived in 1995 when he appeared in six films. Something had to hit, and something did in the form of Robert Rodriguez’s “Desperado”. But the film that finally put it on the top was Martin Campbell’s old -fashioned superproduction “The Mask of Zorro”, of which we have published an oral story.

Advertisement

Sony ended up waste the potential of Zorro’s franchise, but they were not alone in Banderas failing. Before the millennial turning point, he continued to find himself blocked in rejection projects that had probably been refused by a litany of cinema stars who owned a tenth of his charisma. Even more frustrating, the best film in this group, which he immediately made after “The Mask of Zorro”, fell prey to behind the scenes. 26 years after its release, it still ranks as one of the largest bombs at the box office of all time. This film deserved a much better result, but when Disney was able to unload it in 1999, they just wanted their books. Surprisingly, decades later, he finally finds an audience recognizing on Tubi.

“Earters of the Dead” is one of author Michael Crichton’s strangest companies. It is a story of the “Beowulf” myth partly from the point of view of Baghdad Ahmad Ibn Fadlan traveler. It is not a terribly convincing reading, but he had the name of Crichton, which meant that the studio could proclaim that it was “the author of” Jurassic Park “.” Since no American filmmaker had tried to “beowulf” on a big budget, it did not seem to be narrative well-being.

Advertisement

When Disney led John McTiernan to run the film, they could also boast of the poster that she was “from the director of” Die Hard “.” With this pedigree, they were able to court the major stars. McTiernan initially wanted Michael Keaton as Hmad Ibn Fadlan, but they ended up going with the Red -heated bands. Once they have done it on board, they avoided the stars in favor of actors that correspond to the Viking type (for example, Vladimir Kulich, Diane Venora and Dennis Storhøi).

/ Ryan Scott of the film did a great job to explain what was wrong with the budget Which was ultimately entitled “The 13th Warrior”, “ I will therefore not resume this debacle here. All you need to know is that Crichton hated the McTiernan Cup (which has missed it) and reissued it. Curiously, McTiernan says that the author has made very few changes compared to his cut. Once you have exceeded the fact that the release of the film was delayed for a full calendar year and made $ 61 million worldwide over a budget that could have achieved $ 160 million (an incredibly high number in 1999), all that matters is that “the 13th warrior” is an adventure to tear.

Advertisement

I am a fan of Robert Zemeckis’s “Beowulf”, but I prefer to watch McTiernan’s film, which is a muscular epic that attracts you with breathtaking practical waterfalls and striking British places. At the center of the film is Banderas, which removes its high power sex appeal and gives a kind of unique heroic performance. At a little of 103 minutes surprisingly lively, I am not surprised that Tubi viewers did it The third most popular film On service right now. It is not a classic, but it is an exciting adventure that could well find its way on your personal re -evoking list.