Teresa Giudice’s Husband Louis Ruelas Drags Kim D Into Battle With Ex (Excl)
Real New Jersey housewives star Teresa judgehusband, Luis Ruelasand his ex-fiancée Vanessa VoyageThe legal affair was recheured in court with a former Rhonj star Kim Depaola be dragged in the battle, US Weekly can report exclusively.
According to court documents obtained by WeDEPAOLA – Known as “Kim D” at Fans de Bravo – is at the center of an argument in the case. She played as a “guest” on seasons 2 and 3, then became a “friend” of the Housewives During the seasons 4 and 5, making additional appearances on the seasons 7 and 8. In recent court documents, Reiser said that ruelas, 50, accused him of talking about him in Depaola. She denied the claims that she did something wrong.
Ruelas and Reiser separated at the end of 2020 after two years together. A few months after the split, ruelas continued Reiser and asked her to restore the engagement ring while detailing the problems on money.
Reiser has filed a reconvention request denying all the allegations of reprehensible acts and accusing ruelas of controlling and harming his business. They both deny all the allegations of reprehensible acts of the other.
In July 2020, the ex concluded an agreement where ruelas kept the engagement ring and the two parties were ordered not to make derogatory declarations to third parties on the other.
In October 2024, ruelas filed new judicial documents accused Reiser of having violated the order of the court by posing defamatory content on social networks. He asked that she was found in contempt.
Reiser’s lawyer denied complaints. He said: “Each exhibition [Ruelas] used to establish a violation allegedly … and to establish and presume a contempt, was refuted and disputed by [Reiser]. Indeed, there is no evidence to establish that it has violated the consent order; There is also no evidence that [Ruelas] has been damaged in any way. »»

Luis Ruelas and Teresa Giudice
Gabe Ginsberg / Getty ImagesIn the recent deposit, ruelas demanded one of the lawyers to reiser Douglas Anton be disqualified because it previously represented Depaola. Anton is Coconsil of the main lawyer to Reiser, Richard Schioppo.
Ruelas said that Depaola is a crucial witness in the case and argued that it was a conflict to Reiser to be represented by the former lawyer in Depaola.
“The ethical concerns surrounding a lawyer who is taken between contradictory loyalty – namely his duty towards the defendant Reiser and his prosecutor -client relationship with Kim Depeola – Sapped the equity of the procedure,” said the ruelas lawyer.
“Given the previous representation of Mr. Anton de Kim Depaola and his continuous involvement with her on a professional basis, there is no doubt that her continuous representation of Reisse is unacceptable under ethical and legal standards,” he added.
Anton opposed the request claiming that Ruelas did not propose any evidence that his previous representation of Depaola would have an impact on his testimony.

Kim Depaola
Lars Niki / Getty Images for Cosmopolitan NyfwHe said: “Although I certainly appreciate the concern, this is simply not the case as a representation of Ms. Depaola in the past on the questions for which I have represented it, in no way affects the current representation of the Reiser defendant. In fact, it was Ms. Depaola who first referred the reiser defendant for me.
Depaola filed a statement in the case supporting Anton. She said that she had known the lawyer for over 15 years and that there was no “confidential” information which is protected by the privilege of the lawyer’s client who could in any way affect the trial at hand.
“There is no reason why I can understand that Doug should be disqualified from this case,” she said.
In her file, Reiser said she was a friend with Depaola since 2021, who referred her to Anton. The disqualification request was rejected on August 7.
In April 2020, ruelas filed its pursuit against Reiser requiring a temporary protection prescription, the return of the engagement ring and “other properties packaged at the wedding of the parties” and all the money spent for authorized transactions.
In addition, he asked for a prohibition prescription preventing Reiser from using their joint credit card or their joint funds. Ruelas also requested legal costs.
In court documents, ruelas said that he started going out with Reiser in 2018 and that he was hired in early 2019. He said that he had bought him a diamond ring of four carats, worth $ 135,000. He said he also supported her while she was studying for a license. He said they bought a $ 1.7 million house and spent hundreds of thousands for renovations. He said he had paid thousands of deposits for marriage.

Teresa Giudice and Luis Ruelas
HAPA / GC blonde imagesHe pleaded for an order of the court preventing Reiser from communicating with him, the return of the engagement ring and various other requests on the money spent.
In response, Reiser criticized the presumed ruelas behavior during the relationship. She claimed She was forced to “meet her constant and selfish requirements”.
“If she refused to do so, he would be mean, cold and withdrawn,” said the trial. Reiser said, with the exception of the engagement ring, none of the gifts on ruelas offered him with the wedding condition attached. Reiser said she would make the engagement ring.
In court documents, she described ruelas as a check.
In a reconvention request, Reiser said that Ruelas had abandoned her in the Massachusetts in October 2019, then padlocked their New Jersey house. She also accused him of harming her business. She said that the relationship officially ended in March 2020.
Ruelas has denied all the allegations of reprehensible acts.
In addition to the trial, Reiser also asked for a prohibition order against Ruelas in 2023, but the court refused the request.
Ruelas and Giudice, 53, started to go out together In the summer of 2020. They got engaged in October 2021 and married in 2022.
Post Comment