Gina Huynh, Trial Victim-3, Calls For Diddy Release In Judge Letter

Gia Huynh talk about Sean “Diddy” combs and his conviction. Rather than taking her thoughts on social networks, she called on a judge, sharing why she thinks he deserves a deposit. Combs is on his second call for deposit. He wants to be at home while waiting for the law to decide on his conviction for two guilty leaders to engage in prostitution. Gina, the real name Virginia Huynh, was supposed to take a position as a victim-3 against Diddy, but abandoned. Now she clearly said she thought he changed for the best.

For the context, Diddy, 55, was acquitted from a racket conspiracy and sex trafficking fees. With those on the table, he faced the possibility of perpetuity sentences. Meanwhile, each accusation linked to prostitution has a maximum of 10 years in prison.

In relation: Diddy’s ex-girlfriend, Gina Huynh, is spotted and breaks the silence in the middle of her current trial (watch)

Gina Huynh tells the judge that she is not afraid of Diddy

Tmz reported for the first time That Gina wrote a letter asking the judge to let Sean Combs go home with her children. His defense submitted Hunyh’s letter as an exhibition in their last file. According to a Photo analysis of the declarationShe described him as a father, a family and a businessman “who has not been violent for many years”. Although she was not specific, she said that their relationship had “not always been perfect”. However, Gina Hunyh said Diddy had recognized his mistakes and has committed to “make better decisions in the future”.

“I write because I do not consider Mr. Combs as a danger to me or for the community. This is his first criminal affair. Throughout the investigation and procedures, it was cooperative, respectful and in accordance with. Make sure that the DIDDY court will join all the liberation conditions. »»

Gina Huynh closed his letter by saying that allowing Diddy to be at home “will also support the healing process for all those involved”. At the top of the fourth paragraph, she also said that it was Diddy’s first criminal affair, which is not necessarily true. Combs faced criminal charges in the past and was even acquitted accusations of possession of firearms in 2001.

In relation: A chronology of Diddy’s past charges and the only time he was acquitted in 2001

Verification of the facts: Gina abandoned the trial as a victim-3

It is a fact, and the court documents say it. And Gina herself too. Her statement supporting the release of Combres is the first time that she has identified as a mystery witness.

Meanwhile, Casandra ‘Cassie’ Ventura testified under his name, but the second victim used the pseudonym “Jane”. During the trial, Cassie described a brutal cycle of love, financial and social isolation and physical, verbal and sexual abuse. It was a situation again on the move and again which started two years after their meeting in 2005. It lasted until 2018, the same year that she testified that he had raped her. “Jane” has described similar circumstances and incidents involving “freak-offs” and private sexual meetings with male workers under supervision, management and coins.

Declaration of the favorable court and dropping out of first instance witnesses. Gina Huynh was not always silent about her own alleged abusive experiences with Diddy. For example, in 2019, She said to Tasha K that Sean Combs “trampled [her] The stomach is really hard. She said that she kept telling her that she couldn’t breathe, and after starting to retaliate, he would have grasped her by the hair and hit her on the back of the head.

“He was mentally, emotionally and physically. He always compared me to Cassie and told me that I am the bad, she is good,” said Gina. And the people around him allowed it to happen, she added.

These are the type of details that Virginia Huynh had to give the stand of witnesses in the eight -week Diddy trial. But a few days before the start, she changed her air on the prosecutors. The reasons for his withdrawal are still not clear.

Lawyers want Diddy to go out, but prosecutors want years behind bars

According to The Associated PressProsecutors said they were now expecting the Sean Combs music magnate could incur a prison sentence “Impossible more” that the four to five years they once thought.

Diddy’s lawyers asked his $ 50 million bond when he awaits a conviction of October 3. However, Thursday, July 31, they shared the prediction of the determination of the sentence in a written declaration opposed to Combs. Prosecutors said there was a higher risk that Sean would face it. But judge Arun Subramanian will have the last word in his sentence. In addition, he can ignore the accusation guidelines because they are not compulsory. Combs lawyers said they thought the guidelines, if they are properly calculated, will demand 21 to 27 months in prison.

On the day of the verdict, the prosecutors won a fight against the release under bond after the defense lawyer Marc Agnifilo argued that the judge should immediately release Diddy on bail. Subramanian denied the defense request. He said that Combs had not welcomed the burden to show clear and convincing evidence a “lack of danger for anyone or the community”.

In the latest call for bonding, Agnifilo quoted other cases which, according to him, were comparable to the conviction of Combs in which the defendants obtained a deposit. And he cited severe conditions at the metropolitan detention center in Brooklyn. Combs has been in detention since its arrest in September in a New York hotel. He also said that Combs was unjustly treated to engage in a “swingers” lifestyle.

“Sean Combs will not be violent towards anyone. As we said in court, this jury returned his life to him, and he will not waste his second chance of life, and he would do nothing to compromise his seven children having no father, and four of his children would not have a parent at all,” wrote Agnifilo.

The prosecutors said in their file on Thursday that the condemnation of Combs on the charges linked to prostitution required a compulsory requirement to remain in prison before the conviction, unless it can prove exceptional circumstances. They said he couldn’t. Prosecutors also said that the cases cited by AGINFLO are not relevant due to the history of DIDDY’s motif violence.

“The vast history of the accused’s violence – and his attempt continues to minimize his recent violent conduct – demonstrates his danger and that he is not modifiable in supervision,” they wrote. “The defendant fails to establish by clear and convincing evidence, as required, that he does not represent a danger to the community.”

In relation: King Combs details his family’s reflections on the Diddy’s trial, the verdict and the future determination

The writer Associated Press, Larry Neumeister, contributed to this report via AP Newsroom.