Diddy Chooses To Stay Silent In Explosive Trial
While his federal sexual traffic and racket trial approaches his conclusion, several reports now indicate that Diddy will not testify for his own defense.
This means that the jury will neither hear the star or his point of view, exercising any pressure on the strategy based on the consent of the defense.
Legal experts say that the choice could protect him from self-incrimination, but this could also turn around if jurors expect him to defend himself personally.
The article continues below the advertising
Diddy will probably not testify

Diddy pleaded not guilty, but according to a PEOPLE Report, he might not testify in his current trial.
The lawyer for the rapper in disgrace, Marc Agnifilio, offered an index on Tuesday, June 17, when judge Arun Subramanian asked him for an estimate of the duration of the defense.
Agnifilio revealed that it would take less than two days, indicating that Diddy would not take the position, because it would take more than a week if he did.
In the midst of the revelation, analysts are convinced that the maintenance of Diddy du Stand is strategic.
According to them, he will protect the 55-year-old man from the counter-interrogation and limit his words to be used in more than 60 pending civil combinations.
The article continues below the advertising
The former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani specifically believes that Diddy’s defense will focus on the discreditation of the accusers, note that they are after “fame, money or revenge”.
The article continues below the advertising
Diddy’s lawyer suggests that the rapper will take the position

The new revelations take place for months after Agnifilio suggested that Diddy could testify. In an overview of Tmz Documentary “The Downfall of Diddy: The Agreement” shared on September 26, 2024, the lawyer noted that the rapper was impatient to take a stand.
“I don’t know I could keep it out of the stand. I think it is very impatient to tell its story,” he said. “I think he will tell each part of his story, including what you see about the video. He has his story and I think that only he can tell as he can tell in real time. It is a human story. It is a love story, it is a story of injury, it is a story of Heartbreak.”
Suge Knight also thought it was a good idea for Diddy to testify.
The article continues below the advertising
Talk to PEOPLE of prison, the convicted criminal said: “The only means [Combs] Can even start removing part of this pain, it is if they have puff Daddy on the stand and the truth comes out. Puffy should get on the stand and look at these people in the eye and say: “that’s what I did”. »»
The article continues below the advertising
The legal expert says that Diddy’s testimony is a bad idea

Although the former CEO of Death Row Records thought that Diddy testified would make a difference, the legal expert Lisa Bonner shared a different feeling.
“Once you have taken a stand, everything you have done – linked to one of these alleged crimes – become a fair game,” she said Page six.
The lawyer revealed that this would increase the chances of Diddy to go to prison for perjury, because he would be under oath.
As such, it was better to avoid taking a stand. “There is a lot of evidence that will be presented, even so far, that I would not want to answer if I was Diddy,” added Bonner.
“For example,” Did you drop the Molotov cocktail into the car or have you had an involvement in there? ” There is nothing to gain, especially if you have skeletons in your closet, “she finished.
The video “freak-off” is expanding the mixed reactions of jurors

Meanwhile, the current affair took a new turn while “freak-off” videos representing the alleged drug group of Diddy were recently played in court.
According to information, the prosecutors have compiled three videos, each about 11 to 12 minutes, so that the jurors can watch and gave them headphones to listen to the audio.
Tmz reported that around 30 seconds in the compilation, there was a radio silence in the courtroom, and everyone could hear sexual noises from the headphones of the jurors.
Several black jurors won visibly or shook their heads while the explicit scenes played, while a male juror would have grouped at the beginning.
The article continues below the advertising
Other jurors reacted with tense silence, some shaking their heads, others diverting the eyes of the screen.
The judge rejects the black juror

The judge said that the juror initially claimed to live in the Bronx during the jury selection, but later admitted to having moved to New Jersey.
The judge stressed that the decision was based solely on credibility problems, not the race.
According to him, the inconsistencies with the responses of the juror before the court indicated the desire to be misleading in order to climb on the jury.
The licensee juror was replaced by a white alternative, a decision that Diddy’s lawyers thought that “would considerably prejudge” the rapper of “Finna is unleashed”.
Post Comment